Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion | Ninth Circuit oral argument
Yesterday, managing partner John Rushing of Rushing McCarl LLP argued on behalf of Plaintiff-Appellant Jane Doe in the important Ninth Circuit case Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion (Case No. 21-55983). Yesterday’s oral argument illustrates why Rushing, who has a background in entertainment, is one of the premier oral advocates in the nation.
Doe v. Copa Airlines | Ninth Circuit aviation case update
Briefing is complete in the important Ninth Circuit aviation-law case Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion. Rushing McCarl LLP represents a passenger who was sexually assaulted on a Copa Airlines flight. The assault occurred because Copa allowed a felon who was fleeing the United States to board the plane, then did nothing to stop the assault once it was underway.
Attorney Advertising
This website contains attorney advertising. Nothing on this website is intended to provide legal advice or a prediction or guarantee of results. Reports of successful past results are not a guarantee of future results. Photos may be stock photography.
Privacy
We use cookies on this website to improve functionality and performance, to analyze traffic to the website, and to enable social media features.
Disclaimers
No Legal Advice or Attorney-Client Relationship
This content and links on this website are intended for informational and marketing purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Receipt of the information on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not act upon this information without seeking advice from a lawyer licensed in your own state or country.
Do not send us confidential information until you speak with one of our lawyers and receive our authorization to send that information to us. Providing information to the Firm (through the contact form on this website or otherwise) will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not prevent the Firm from representing someone else in connection with the matter in question or a related matter.
Statement in Compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct
Unless otherwise indicated in individual lawyer biographies, the Firm’s lawyers are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Links to Third-Party Resources
Third-party resources that can be accessed with hypertext links from this web site are not under the Firm’s control, and the Firm is not responsible for any of these resources’ contents. These links are provided only for your convenience. Our linking to an outside resource does not imply any recommendation, approval or endorsement of that resource.
No Warranties
This web site, and all information available on or accessed through this site, is provided “as is.” The Firm makes no warranties, representations, or claims of any kind concerning the information presented on or through this site.
Pro Bono Requests
Online solicitations for pro bono assistance are not accepted and may not receive a response.
Limitation of Liability
Your use of this website is at your own risk. The materials presented on this site may not reflect the most current legal developments. These materials may be changed, improved, or updated without notice. The Firm is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this site’s content or for any outcomes resulting from your use of this site.
