Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion | Ninth Circuit oral argument

Yesterday, managing partner John Rushing of Rushing McCarl LLP argued on behalf of Plaintiff-Appellant Jane Doe in the important Ninth Circuit case Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion (Case No. 21-55983). Yesterday’s oral argument illustrates why Rushing, who has a background in entertainment, is one of the premier oral advocates in the nation.

Doe v. Copa Airlines | Ninth Circuit aviation case update

Briefing is complete in the important Ninth Circuit aviation-law case Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion. Rushing McCarl LLP represents a passenger who was sexually assaulted on a Copa Airlines flight. The assault occurred because Copa allowed a felon who was fleeing the United States to board the plane, then did nothing to stop the assault once it was underway.

Cookies Information

We use cookies on this website to improve functionality and performance, to analyze traffic to the website, and to enable social media features. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our privacy policy.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its use.

Social Sharing Cookies

We use social sharing plugins to allow you to share certain pages of our website on social media. These plugins may place cookies that allow the tracking of users across different websites that use these sharing plugins. We use that data, if at all, only to analyze the website and social media use patterns.