Rushing McCarl has asked the California Supreme Court to resolve a longstanding disagreement about which orders can be appealed under the collateral order doctrine.
Last week, Rushing McCarl LLP filed a first-in-the-nation putative class action complaint against the makers of the popular Stanley tumbler cups for the company’s failure to disclose that its products contain lead.
When an executive was sued by her former employer for misappropriating trade secrets, she turned the tables by hiring aggressive business litigation boutique Rushing McCarl LLP.
Founding Partner Ryan McCarl’s book Elegant Legal Writing (U. Cal. Press 2024) shares strategies Rushing McCarl LLP uses every day to help its clients win high-stakes litigation cases.
Rushing McCarl LLP drafted an amicus brief co-signed by 1,700 concerned alumni supporting the University of Michigan’s legal challenge to the suspension of Coach Jim Harbaugh.
Rushing McCarl LLP is writing a pro bono amicus brief for alumni to support the University of Michigan’s efforts to block the Big Ten’s suspension of Head Coach Jim Harbaugh.
Business litigation boutique Rushing McCarl LLP secured a $17.8 million federal jury verdict on behalf of Los Angeles cosmetics manufacturer Virgin Scent, Inc. dba Artnaturals.
Rushing McCarl filed one of the earliest cryptocurrency fraud cases: the matter of Chavez v. Jordan- Jones, Case. Chavez and Rushing McCarl were featured this week in a Forbes article.
Rushing McCarl LLP attorneys Ryan McCarl, John Rushing, and Davit Avagyan just filed an opening brief on behalf of Jane Doe in the Ninth Circuit case Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion. Doe alleges that she was the victim of an inflight sexual assault experienced while she was flying from Los Angeles to Panama.
Rushing McCarl filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Ambedkar International Center in a landmark case targeting caste discrimination in California workplaces.